Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Steroids in Baseball



            As an American—as a man brought up on the Bill of Rights and habeas corpus as much as I was on baseball—I have a number of problems with the MLB’s investigation into the Biogenesis program. Biogenesis director Tony Bosch has agreed to cooperate with Major League Baseball as it wishes to pursue suspensions in twenty MLB players including Alex Rodriguez and the Milwaukee Brewers’ Ryan Braun.
            Major League Baseball’s evidence comes completely in two forms as of now: Bosch’s testimony and acquired handwritten documents. No Major League player has ever been suspended for PEDs without failing a drug test, and there is no reason to believe that this investigation would be able to obtain that kind of evidence. A number of questions are raised with the documents themselves, as Braun has stated that his name was on strictly for pursuing legal advice from Bosch last season after he had failed a test—a test that did not see him suspended due to a successful appeal. These documents, as unprofessional as they may be, would likely found permissible in a court of law, but the area is gray in whether or not they are reliable.
            In the realm of “beyond reasonable doubt”—a concept that still seems to confuse and puzzle juries today—there is always the possibility of Rodriguez, Braun, or Melky Cabrera buying PEDs for someone else’s use, as improbable as this explanation may be. This, while still violating the law, would not find them worthy of suspension in Major League Baseball’s eyes.
            Bosch’s testimony itself may bring up more questions than answers, as it is clear that he is testifying in order to get the MLB to drop the civil suit it has against him. This is certainly something that a good lawyer hired by these athletes can and will pick apart, in addition to things like the lack of signatures on the documents and no seeming way to trace any money Biogenesis received to these players.
            With all these questions having been raised, Major League Baseball may still be able to suspend these athletes. Since they are a private organization not pursuing criminal charges against these players as of now, they do not need evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to suspend. While this could outrage the MLBPA and lead to perhaps more lawsuits, it appears that Major League Baseball would be acting within legal boundaries to perform such an action. Just because no one has been suspended without failing a drug test does not mean that this cannot happen; it just means that the MLB has not pursued a case with as much zeal as the one right now.
            Then why the federal investigation? Why put Bosch under sworn testimony if these athletes do not see the same protection against Major League Baseball’s steroid witch-hunt as an alleged murderer or rapist would get from the prosecutors? The lack of hard evidence may very well find these athletes not guilty in a criminal court, but that will not necessarily keep them from facing 100-game suspensions.
            I have little doubt in my mind that most if not all of these players are guilty of using performance enhancing drugs, but that is not the point of this investigation. The MLB had no doubt about Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, and numerous other ex-players but was unable to do anything there except waste tax dollars on hearings and investigations that lasted years. This is no different, save for the fact that these players are still playing. The reliance on federal help is still there, and the hard evidence isn’t.
            This scandal has additionally proven to us all that Major League Baseball’s anti-drug policy has utterly failed. Players like Yankee first baseman Mark Teixeira—teammate to alleged Biogenesis clients Alex Rodriguez and Francisco Cervelli—have remarked upon the strictness of the MLB’s anti-drug policy and how baseball still apparently has a PED problem. It seems as if Major League Baseball should devote more time to adjusting its current policy than attacking its players without any hard evidence.

No comments:

Post a Comment